Why Give Clients More Than One Mockup?
I might be alone here, but does anyone else think it’s a bit odd that a majority of web firms/agencies are happily giving their clients more than one mockup during the design phase of a project? I’m of the opinion that if enough initial research has been done about the client, their target audience, their goals, their existing brand/identity, their competition, their budget, etc., then the design team should have enough information in their arsenal to come up with a great design that meets most, if not all, of the project’s goals the first time around.
If a mockup is created and, when presented to the client, it’s met with unsatisfactory reviews, then it’s likely that the initial research wasn’t thorough enough or that the client wasn’t clear with some of the information they provided.
Sometimes, though, the client provides accurate information and the design team creates a great mockup that meets all of the project’s goals, but the client quickly turns into a web designer and begins asking the design team to make adjustments, some of which are minor, others, not so much.
It is at this point that the team needs to make some goal-based decisions; are the client’s design requests going to negatively effect the site’s ability to meet all of the goals originally agreed upon? Will they negatively effect the perception the target audience may have regarding the client’s brand/identity? Do any of the requests completely ignore long-standing best-practices or present an opportunity to confuse visitors who are used to common conventions on the web?
If the answer is yes, the design team owes it to the client to discuss their requests and politely inform them that it wouldn’t be in their best interests to make those changes. It’s helpful to remind the client that they certainly know what is best for their customers, but you know how to best deliver that great service and brand/identity of theirs through a website. I often find that it’s this very conversation and a fear of engaging in it that drives many firms/agencies to avoid it altogether by presenting the client with more than one mockup, hoping that they will pick only their favorite one and everyone involved will dance with joy while the process gracefully moves into the next phase. This, though, is rarely what happens.
When presented with more than one mockup, the client often begins to Frankenstein them; meaning, they ask that some design elements and/or features from one mockup be inserted into another mockup. This, of course, frustrates the designers, but the client rightfully assumes that said design elements and/or features can, and should, be plugged into place in any one of the mockups presented to them. It isn’t that easy, as many of us know, since many of the mockup’s qualities are disrupted during such Frankensteining.
Much of this can be avoided by presenting the client with one mockup that achieves all of the project’s goals. If the client resists the design, it’s the design team’s job to politely let them know why certain decisions were made, how they will best meet the goals agreed upon, and why they will succeed at engaging the client’s target audience, resulting in more traffic and higher sales/conversion/etc.
After the client is informed why certain design decisions were made, they still might be very resistant to moving forward with the great mockup that was made. If this is the case, there are a couple options:
- The firm/agency can politely bow out of the project, letting the client know that it is no longer a good fit for either party. It might be considered a huge step backward for the firm/agency, but it’s best to be involved only in projects that result in the team’s best efforts being put online. If this is the path chosen, there is the option of returning the client’s deposit and keeping the mockups for later use, or keep the deposit and send them the mockups they’ve paid for.
- The firm/agency can proceed with changing the mockup or creating a couple more, whatever the client requested. Often, projects like this will never find their way to the design team’s portfolio and can result in a stale, unexciting relationship with the client. In the long run, the client’s visitor traffic and sales goals/conversions will probably suffer and they’re less likely to put more time, money, and energy into future web-related projects of their own.
Again, I might be one of the only people who has this opinion when it comes to offering a client more than one design mockup and I wouldn’t be very surprised if that really was the case. I do, however, feel strongly about this subject since it often results in inefficient web firms/agencies and poorly designed, stale, websites that don’t yield the returns originally expected or meet the goals originally agreed upon, and that, my friend, dilutes the quality and effectiveness of the Internet.




Unfortunately the solution lies more in the realm of adjusting client expectations than a firm’s process. Unless the entire industry were to take a unified approach, there’s always another shop down the road. And there are bills to pay.
We recently held our ground on only one design concept. It was due to a really tight timeframe, though. The client went to someone else who agreed to do multiple concepts and asked if we’d execute the winner. We declined. He probably won’t make his deadline, which we would have guaranteed. It was more important to him, though, to have 3 concepts.
Frankensteining sucks but it doesn’t have to be either or. A few concepts can be created AND the client can be educated. Successful outcome hinges upon the relationship and its footing moreso than process.
Mark
19 Feb 08 at 9:15 am
Clients are not designers. That is presumably why they have hired us as web professionals. Allowing clients any degree of flexibility in the design process is a slippery slope indeed.
That being said, the best compromise I’ve found is a clear statement of roles at the beginning of the relationship, as well as consistent reminders throughout. Couple this with rapid design iterations in a browser context, and most ‘designers’ can be persuaded to allow you the elbow room you need to do the work at hand proper justice.
Angelo
19 Feb 08 at 9:56 am
I think multiple concepts are a must when presenting to a client. The best way I know how to compare it is buying a new car.
I know I want a car that has 4 wheels, power everything, cruise control, a sun roof and air conditioning. That’s what I want. Now I have to figure out what color I want. Do I want a Chevy or an Audi? Am I more like a Impala, or an A6. Different car makes and models are like different concepts presented to a client.
Now, is that to say that you should present 5 concepts and have 4 rounds of revisions, NO, not even close. I think 3 concepts are the max you should show, and if you can’t get a design right in 2 or 3 rounds after the concept is chosen, then there’s obviously a communication breakdown with the client.
As for frankensteining, it’s just an unfortunate outcome sometimes, but should NEVER apply to function. If one concept has a search and the others don’t, then somebody didn’t do their job. Sometimes clients just don’t like color combinations or image choices. You can do all the research in the world, ask the client 100 times what they want, and when you do it, they might not like it. Design leaves so much room for interpretation, you rarely nail what a client wants with one attempt.
Paul
19 Feb 08 at 12:25 pm
@paul, By giving clients these kind of ‘choices’, it opens up the floodgates for design disaster. Your dealership analogy likens all web designers to pre-fabricated template shops. This just isn’t the case.
Clients hire designers to carefully establish custom solutions for the client’s audience. I’d think of it more as if you were designing your own car from scratch. Sure, you’re using mostly pre-fabricated parts for functionality (e.g. an engine for search, wheels for navigation) but the design, the body that holds the vehicle is molded by hand, with each design consideration taken into account.
I know I’m idealizing this process quite a bit here, but it’s to make a point. What we do should be most valuable to the client’s audience. (That’s who is making them money and who they should ultimately care about.) We are tasked with the goal of protecting this intimate, complex relationship.
Angelo
25 Feb 08 at 12:51 pm
Yes, I have also come to the viewpoint that usually 1 mockup is fine and the more options I give the client the more confused he usually will get and out of experience, he will always chose the design I like the least and only put in “for good measures” (what a stupid thought that ‘more is better’ – must come from the ‘Supersize Me’ push in fast food stores).
I much rather put more work into 1 good design then split the same time into 3 quickies. Doing my home work first and listening to the client, this has been very successful.
The other day when I completely missed the ballpark with a new logo was when from the meeting the clients had said bronze/gold/copper for colors but the reaction to the design idea then was ‘oh, nothing spoke to us, I thought we are going to use cobalt blue and bright yellow’…
Marlyse Comte
25 Feb 08 at 9:08 pm